Surgical site infections have a negative effect on
the postoperative recovery period. They are associated
with increased treatment intensity, prolong lenght
of stay, higher costs, morbidity, and mortality.[
1,
3,
8-
10]
Major postoperative infections including bloodstream
infections and SSIs occur in up to 5% of patients after
cardiac surgery.[
10,
11]
The reported incidence of infectious
complications after cardiac surgery has ranged
between 5 to 21% of cases.[12] While superficial
sternal wound infections include skin, subcutaneous
tissue and pectoralis fascia, deep sternal wound
infections involve the sternal bone, substernal
space and the mediastinum, and occur in 0.5 to 8%
and 0.4 to 2% respectively.[5] In this study, the SSI
rates were found to be similar with the literature.
Hannan et al.[13] and Li et al.[14] reported an all-cause
readmission rate of 16.5 and 13.2%, respectively
within 30 days of CABG. Both aforementioned
authors concluded that postoperative infection was the
most common reason for rehospitalization, consistent
with our study findings.
The mortality rate of patients who develop SSI
after cardiac surgery is significantly higher than those
without SSI, ranging between 22 and 40%.[3] In our
study, there were no infection-related mortality.
In recent years, there are many attempts to identify
predictors for the development of SSI after cardiac
surgery in the field of surgery.[3] The management
of SSI is complex and prevention according to the
risk factor modification offers the most effective
intervention. A host of independent risk factors have
been identified for SSIs.[5] These predictors have
been also examined in terms of patient, surgery, and
hospitalization.
The patient-related predictors are age (>85 years),
sex, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), concomitant diseases
(i.e., COPD, respiratory failure, renal failure and
hemodialysis, DM, cardiogenic shock, history of MI,
and aortic calcification), the use immunosuppressive
agents, and smoking. Risk factors for surgery are
type of surgery (combined valve + CABG and aortic
procedures), reexploration (reopening) for bleeding,
blood transfusions, CPB time, and using IABP. Risk
factors for hospitalization are preoperative length of
stay in hospital more than three days, and preparation
of the patient for surgery.[5,15,16] In this study, the age,
sex, BMI, DM, heart failure, peripheral vascular
disease, COPD, cardiogenic shock, and preoperative
MI did not show a significant correlation with SSIs.
However, smoking and renal failure were significantly
associated with SSI development.
Several studies demonstrated that age, female
sex, high preoperative serum glucose levels
(>200 mg/dL), DM, obesity, and smoking were
statistically significantly correlated with SSI
development.[11,17,18] Bhatia et al.[17] reported that,
in patients over the age of 66 years, the changes of
developing wound infections were twice as high as in
patients aged between 21 and 50 years.
On the other hand, there are conflicting reports on
sex as a risk factor for SSI development. Some authors
have reported an increased risk, while some others
have shown a decreased risk in males.[19] There are also
reports showing no significant correlation between sex
and SSI development. Rogers et al.[20] reported that
women were more likely to receive allogeneic red blood
cells or platelets than men. The authors found that
patients who received allogeneic blood were 4.4 times
more likely to develop an infection than those who did
not and women had a greater risk of infection.
Kanafani et al.[21] and Fowler et al.[11] reported
that a BMI of >40 kg/m2, chronic renal failure
with hemodialysis, and chronic lung disease had a
higher risk of developing major infections after cardiac surgery. In addition, Rahmanian et al.[22] reported that
a BMI value of exceeding 30 kg/m2 and diabetes were
the main predictors for SSI development.
Furthermore, several studies have shown that
obesity has a weak correlation with SSI and having
sternotomy.[23] The possible reason for obesity being
a risk factor include ineffective dose of prophylactic
antibiotics, difficulty in proper skin preparation,
adipose tissue providing a good substrate for infection
and difficulties in vascular graft harvesting.[17]
Diabetes, particularly uncontrolled diabetes,
is a significant independent risk factor for the
development of SSI in perioperative cardiac surgical
patients.[3,11,16,17,24] High perioperative blood glucose
concentrations have been identified as a risk factor
for SSI after cardiothoracic surgery.[15,21,25] In patients
with diabetes, postoperative hyperglycemia has been
also associated with adverse outcomes such as death,
MI, stroke, and septic complications before hospital
discharge.[3,21,25-27] Maintaining a serum glucose of
<180 mg/dL with continuous insulin infusions in
patients with and without DM reduces morbidity
and mortality, lowers the incidence of sternal wound
infections, shortens hospital length of stay, and improves
long-term survival.[28] Poor glycemic control prior to
surgery, however, contributes to poor diabetes control
after hospital discharge and increases the incidence
of complications, such as poor wound healing and
higher rates of SSI, and rehospitalization and increased
mortality, eventually.[29,30] It is likely that the benefits
of glucose control extend to cardiac surgical patients, as
most of the large-scale glucose control studies included
cardiothoracic surgery patients and as poor glucose
control is associated with a higher risk of SSI.[5,31,32]
In this study, CPB time, aortic cross-clamp time,
operation time, length of stay in the ICU, blood
transfusion, blood glucose regulation, and type of
surgery did not show a significant correlation with
the SSI development. However, the use of IABP
was found to be significantly associated with the SSI
development.
In our study, the mean duration of surgery was
4.5±1.0 (min: 2-max: 8) hours. Duration of surgery
may be also a risk factor. Operations lasting for more
than two hours are known to be associated with
increased infection rates.[17] Fowler et al.[11] reported
that infections were associated with perfusion time
(200 to 300 min), placement of IABP, and the presence
of three or more distal anastomoses.
In recent studies, blood transfusion has
been identified as an independent risk factor.
Blood transfusion is associated with impaired
immunocompetence.[17] Although transfusion may
be necessary to prevent or treat tissue hypoxia,
the immunomodulatory effects of allogeneic blood
transfusion have been recognized for decades.
Transfusion-related immunomodulation has been
also shown to result in an increased risk of nosocomial
infections and mortality in many patient cohorts.[3]
Rogers et al.[20] reported that patients who received
allogenic blood transfusion were four times more
likely to develop infection after cardiac surgery.
However, in our study, there was no statistically
significant correlation between the use of blood
transfusion and rehospitalization.
Postoperative SSI increased the length of hospital
stay and cost in proportion to the severity of infection.
The cost increased by 3.8%, 14.7%, and 29.4% in
mild, moderate, and severe infections, respectively.[17]
In a study, the length of hospital stay was found to be
5.9 and 15 days, respectively.[17] Fowler et al.[11] showed
that 47% of cardiac surgery patients with SSI required
more than 14 days in the hospital. In another study, the
presence of SSI prolonged the length of stay by about
9.7 (range, 6 to 14) days.[3] This increase in the length
of stay is also consistent with our study findings.
Skin preparation for surgery is one of the
key elements to prevent postoperative infections.
Investigating skin preparation modalities, such as
hair removal and preoperative antiseptic showering,
would build further evidence for best nursing
practice and help nurse managers to develop and
implement a protocol for appropriate preoperative
skin preparation.[2,3]
Although postoperative wound care and dressing
is well-investigated in the literature, there is a limited
number of data regarding the timing for the first
dressing as the predictor for SSIs. Timing of the
first postoperative dressing affects the inflammatory
phase of wound healing.[33] The duration of the
inflammatory phase of wound healing is about two to
three days. Investigating whether to cover the wound
for two to three days affects the wound infection rate
would be helpful to develop and implement a protocol
for the wound care postoperatively.[3]
In their study, Dal et al.[34] reported that, after
discharge, 24.5% of patients experienced a problem
related to caring at home, 60.4% had surgery wound infections, and 63.5% patients were readmitted to
hospital. Good discharge planning and home-based
care services would improve patient recovery following
surgery and prevent complications. Postoperative
bathing and showering may also remove the dead
skin cells, dirt, microorganisms, and sweat that have
collected around the wound edges. It may also reduce
contamination of the surgical site, help to prevent
infection, and promote wound healing.[35,36] However,
in a study, Toon et al.[36] reported no statistically
significant difference in the rate of SSI development
between the patients having early versus late
postoperative bathing. In another study, Ucar[37] also
reported that the postoperative rate of infectious
complications was similar in patients having early
versus late postoperative bathing.
This study has some limitations. First, all of the
patients studied were from a single academic medical
center, and our results may not represent patients
developing SSI in other institutions. Second, this study
does not take into account the socioeconomic status that
may lead to infection development while addressing
some factors affecting the development of infection.
In conclusion, infectious complications can be
reduced with many simple measures, starting with risk
factor modification at the first anesthetic preoperative
screening visit thorough to postoperative risk factor
vigilance in the intensive care unit and after discharge.
Nurse-led reminder systems, care bundles, admission
order sets, and discharge protocols appear to be
particularly effective at meeting the quality targets
in the management of Surgical site infections.[3,38]
Of note, Surgical site infections are certainly major
complications of cardiovascular surgery. It should
be, therefore, kept in mind that risk factors should
be minimized during the procedure to employ more
effective preventive measures for postoperative wound
infections.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect
to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research
and/or authorship of this article.