Cardiovascular Surgery and Interventions 2024, Vol 11, Num 3 Page(s): 177-182
Relationship between prognostic nutritional index and contrast-induced nephropathy in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome
DOI: 10.5606/e-cvsi.2024.1721
Yusuf Demir
Department of Cardiology, İzmir Bakırçay University, İzmir, Türkiye
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, contrast-induced nephropathy, prognostic nutritional index
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate malnutrition with the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and investigate its association with contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN).

Patients and methods: The retrospective cohort study was conducted with 162 acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients (113 males, 49 females; mean age: 58.6±12.6 years; range, 26 to 92 years) admitted between Novomber 2016 and September 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to laboratory, angiographic, demographic, and echocardiographic parameters: those with CIN (n=16) and those without CIN (n=146). The data were obtained from the hospital system, and patients with complete parameters were included in the study. The PNI score was computed by multiplying the total lymphocyte count (mm3) by 0.005 and adding it to 10 times the serum albumin (g/dL).

Results: Twenty-one (12.9%) of the patients had non-end-stage renal failure before the procedure, and the development of CIN was significantly higher in those with baseline renal dysfunction (50% vs. 8.9%, p<0.001). The PNI was significantly lower in the group that developed CIN (43.5±5.5 vs. 50.4±8.7, p=0.002). In-hospital mortality occurred in six (3.7%) of 162 patients who underwent PCI due to myocardial infarction. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the CIN group (18.8% vs. 2.1%, p=0.01). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, a PNI <46 had 69% sensitivity and 75% specificity (area under the curve=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.646-0.879, p=0.001) for determining CIN.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrated that PNI, a marker of nutritional status, may be a reliable predictor of contrast nephropathy in patients presenting with ACS.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a significant contributor to mortality, with a steady rise in occurrence despite advancements in therapy, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).[1] Therefore, it is necessary to identify high-risk patients based on their modifiable risk factors and use suitable therapies to enhance their prognosis. Malnutrition is an escalating worldwide health problem linked to adverse consequences of several illnesses.[2] The correlation between malnutrition and a poor outcome in cardiovascular disease has been demonstrated.[3,4] Nevertheless, there is a lack of studies investigating the correlation between malnutrition and contrastinduced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with ACS. Hence, this study aimed to examine the impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on the development of CIN in individuals who presented with ACS.
  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • The retrospective cohort study included 162 consecutive patients (113 males, 49 females; mean age: 58.6±12.6 years; range, 26 to 92 years) with ACS patients without end-stage renal disease and were admitted to the cardiology clinic of the Çiğli Training and Research Hospital between Novomber 2016 and September 2017. Patients with end-stage renal disease and those receiving hemodialysis were excluded from the study. Percutaneous coronary intervention was carried out in accordance with the treatment recommendations, based on the judgment of the attending physician. A written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The study protocol was approved by the İzmir Bakırçay University Ethics Committee (date: 08.03.2023 no: 2023/905). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Since the study did not include details on the exact kind of PCI therapy, the interventional cardiologists made the decision to perform predilatation, utilize intravascular ultrasound, and choose a particular type of drug-eluting stent. Patients were divided into two groups: those who developed CIN after the operations and those who did not develop CIN. Laboratory and echocardiographic data of the patients were obtained from the hospital information system.

    The PNI score was calculated by multiplying the total lymphocyte count (mm3) by 0.005 and adding it to 10 times the serum albumin (g/dL).[5] Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as the impairment of kidney function, measured as either a 25% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or a 0.5 mg/dL (44 μmol/L) increase in absolute serum creatinine value, within 48 to 72 h after intravenous contrast administration.

    Statistical analysis
    Data were evaluated in IBM SPSS version 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The distribution of variables was evaluated with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the homogeneity of variance was evaluated with the Levene test, and all continuous variables presented normal distribution. Data determined by measurement were given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for those with normal distribution. The unpaired t-test was used in the analysis of these data. Categorical data were shown as absolute and relative frequencies, and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used, as appropriate. Variables were analyzed at a 95% confidence interval, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used, and the area under the curve was calculated.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Contrast-induced nephropathy developed in 16 (10%) of the patients. Sixty-four (40%) of the patients had anterior myocardial infarction (MI), 62 (38%) had inferior MI, and 36 (22%) had MI involving other walls. The majority of patients (74%) who underwent primary PCI were in the Killip Class I. Twenty-one (12.9%) of the patients had non-end-stage renal failure before the procedure, and the development of CIN was significantly higher in those with baseline renal dysfunction (50% vs. 8.9%, p<0.001). Development of CIN was significantly higher in the female sex and older age (p=0.007 and p<0.001, respectively). Rate of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was higher in the CIN group, whereas the mean left ventricular ejection fraction value was lower in the CIN group (Table 1).

    Table 1: Baseline characteristics of patients according to CIN development

    The PNI was significantly lower in the group that developed CIN (43.5±5.5 vs. 50.4±8.7, p=0.002). Furthermore, the rate of high fasting blood sugar and low hemoglobin and low hematocrit levels were significantly higher in the CIN group (p<0.05; Table 2).

    Table 2: Baseline laboratory parameters on admission of patients according to CIN development

    In-hospital mortality occurred in six (3.7%) of 162 patients who underwent PCI due to MI. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the CIN group (18.8% vs. 2.1%, p=0.01).

    In the receiver operating characteristic analysis (Figure 1), a PNI <46 had 69% sensitivity and 75% specificity (area under the curve=0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.646-0.879, p=0.001) for determining CIN.

    Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve of PNI for predicting the development of CIN.
    ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; PNI: Prognostic nutritional index; CIN: Contrast-induced nephropathy.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • The study assessed nutritional status using the PNI method and found that those with low PNI scores had significantly lower nutritional status and a higher incidence of CIN. Coronary angiography and PCI depend on the use of iodinated intravascular contrast to observe blood vessels and chambers. Although there have been improvements in imaging and interventional procedures, the use of iodinated contrast still has the potential to cause contrast-induced acute kidney damage in some high-risk individuals.[6] This disorder has a complicated pathogenesis, with a prevalence reaching up to 30%, and is linked to increased rates of both short-term and long-term illness and death.[7,8]

    Considering the clinical situation and features of the patient, intravenous hydration should be taken into account as a component of the treatment for ACS patients with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate who are scheduled for invasive management. This is done to reduce the likelihood of CIN.[8-12] In our study, patients with ACS were analyzed. In these patients, it is recommended to use less contrast, administer high-dose statin in the early period, and provide intravenous hydration. Contrast-induced nephropathy is usually transient in these patients, but when dialysis is required, it can significantly impair long-term outcomes. Therefore, predicting which patients may develop CIN is important for post-PCI treatment decisions.

    Prior research has shown a correlation between malnutrition and an increased susceptibility to contrast-associated acute kidney injury during PCI.[3] Hypoalbuminemia raises cardiovascular risk primarily via the reduction of albumin's antioxidant, oncotic pressure-maintaining, and antithrombotic abilities.[13] Decreased absolute lymphocyte numbers imply impaired immunological responses caused by malnutrition.[14] Malnutrition scores have the potential to aid in the categorization of risk and evaluation of prognosis.

    In 1984, Onodera et al.[13] evaluated the nutritional and immunological condition of cancer patients who were having gastrointestinal surgery. In recent years, PNI has established recognition as a unique prognostic marker for several illnesses, including diabetic nephropathy, heart failure, and coronavirus disease 2019.[15-24] To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature investigating the relationship between nutritional status and the development of contrast nephropathy in patients with ACS.

    This study had several limitations, the primary one being its retrospective and single-center design. Additionally, the PNI's ability to predict nutritional status was similarly restricted. There may be variations in nutritional indices among various ethnic communities. As the PNI was generated using the original reference values, we did not have information about the changes in the nutritional values of the patients. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the effect of dietary status on CIN in individuals with ACS.

    In conclusion, this study demonstrated that PNI, a marker of nutritional status, may be a reliable predictor of contrast nephropathy in patients presenting with ACS. A low PNI score indicates an inadequate nutritional status, which is thought to accelerate inflammatory processes and lead to acute kidney injury.

    Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Conflict of Interest: The author declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

    Funding: The author received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References
  • 1) Szummer K, Jernberg T, Wallentin L. From early pharmacology to recent pharmacology interventions in acute coronary syndromes: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;74:1618-36. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2019.03.531.

    2) Ni W, Guo K, Shi S, Cheng L, Zhou Y, Zhang F, et al. Prevalence and prognostic value of malnutrition in patients with acute coronary syndrome and chronic kidney disease. Front Nutr 2023;10:1187672. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1187672.

    3) Chen L, Zhang S, Luo M, He C, You Z, Zhang L, et al. Assessing the predictive value of different nutritional indexes for contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 2024;88:902-10. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0479.

    4) Teker Açıkel ME, Korkut AK. Impact of Controlling Nutritional Status Score (CONUT) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PIN) on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2019;22:E294- 7. doi: 10.1532/hsf.2493.

    5) Pinato DJ, North BV, Sharma R. A novel, externally validated inflammation-based prognostic algorithm in hepatocellular carcinoma: The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). Br J Cancer 2012;106:1439-45. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.92.

    6) McCullough PA, Choi JP, Feghali GA, Schussler JM, Stoler RM, Vallabahn RC, et al. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:1465-73. doi: 10.1016/j. jacc.2016.05.099.

    7) Marenzi G, Cosentino N, Bartorelli AL. Acute kidney injury in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Heart 2015;101:1778-85. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307773.

    8) Szummer K, Lundman P, Jacobson SH, Schön S, Lindbäck J, Stenestrand U, et al. Relation between renal function, presentation, use of therapies and in-hospital complications in acute coronary syndrome: Data from the SWEDEHEART register. J Intern Med 2010;268:40-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2796.2009.02204.x.

    9) Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M. ‘Ten commandments’ for the 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:79-80. doi: 10.1093/ eurheartj/ehy855.

    10) Kume K, Yasuoka Y, Adachi H, Noda Y, Hattori S, Araki R, et al. Impact of contrast-induced acute kidney injury on outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2013;14:253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2013.07.009.

    11) Davenport MS, Perazella MA, Yee J, Dillman JR, Fine D, McDonald RJ, et al. Use of intravenous iodinated contrast media in patients with kidney disease: Consensus statements from the American College of Radiology and the National Kidney Foundation. Kidney Med 2020;2:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.01.001.

    12) Schweiger MJ, Chambers CE, Davidson CJ, Blankenship J, Bhalla NP, Block PC, et al. Prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: Recommendations for the high risk patient undergoing cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007;69:135-40. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20964.

    13) Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001-5.

    14) Zencirkiran Agus H, Kahraman S. Prognostic nutritional index predicts one-year outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Acta Cardiol 2020;75:450-5. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2019.1661139.

    15) Zhang J, Xiao X, Wu Y, Yang J, Zou Y, Zhao Y, et al. Prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of diabetic nephropathy progression. Nutrients 2022;14:3634. doi: 10.3390/nu14173634.

    16) Barutcu Atas D, Tugcu M, Asicioglu E, Velioglu A, Arikan H, Koc M, et al. Prognostic nutritional index is a predictor of mortality in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol 2022;54:1155-62. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021- 03002-6.

    17) Al-Shami I, Hourani HMA, Alkhatib B. The use of Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and selected inflammatory indicators for predicting malnutrition in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study. J Infect Public Health 2023;16:280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.018.

    18) Chen QJ, Qu HJ, Li DZ, Li XM, Zhu JJ, Xiang Y, et al. Prognostic nutritional index predicts clinical outcome in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Sci Rep 2017;7:3285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03364-x.

    19) Boyraz B, Ibisoglu E, Aslan B. The prognostic value of the Nutritional Prognostic Index (NPI) and Controlling Nutritional status (CONUT) scoring systems in non-ST elevated myocardial infarction patients over 65 years of age. Aging Clin Exp Res 2022;34:555-62. doi: 10.1007/s40520- 021-02039-y.

    20) Keskin M, Hayıroğlu MI, Keskin T, Kaya A, Tatlısu MA, Altay S, et al. A novel and useful predictive indicator of prognosis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the prognostic nutritional index. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2017;27:438-46. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.01.005.

    21) Kurtul A, Gok M, Esenboga K. Prognostic nutritional index predicts contrast-associated acute kidney injury in patients with ST-Segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol Sin 2021;37:496-503. doi: 10.6515/ ACS.202109_37(5).20210413A.

    22) Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Melita H, Mikhailidis DP, Manolis AS. Low serum albumin: A neglected predictor in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Intern Med 2022;102:24-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2022.05.004.

    23) Fock RA, Blatt SL, Beutler B, Pereira J, Tsujita M, de Barros FE, et al. Study of lymphocyte subpopulations in bone marrow in a model of protein-energy malnutrition. Nutrition 2010;26:1021-8. doi: 10.1016/j. nut.2009.08.026.

    24) Güzel T, Avcı E, Kırış T, Arık B, Arslan B, İldırımlı K, et al. Effect of the prognostic nutrition index on longterm outcomes in unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization. Kardiologiia 2023;63:73-9. doi: 10.18087/ cardio.2023.11.n2367.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • References