In comparisons made according to groups; it
was found that there was a statistically significant
difference (p<0.05) between the groups in terms of
sex, age, HT, DM, smoking, fasting blood glucose,
creatinine, eGFR, HDL, triglyceride, fibrinogen, and
CRP levels and WBC count (Table
1).
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the study participants
In the PAD group, it was found that the male sex,
HT, DM, and smoking rates were higher, along with
older age and higher levels of fasting blood glucose,
creatinine, triglyceride, fibrinogen, WBCs, and
CRP (Table 2). There was no statistically significant
difference between the groups in terms of other variables (p>0.05). Variables that were considered
to be more clinically significant and did not have a
high correlation between the variables that showed
differences in pairwise comparisons between groups
(sex, age, HT, DM, smoking, glucose, creatinine,
eGFR, HDL, triglyceride, fibrinogen, WBCs,
monocytes, lymphocytes, platelets, and CRP) were
included in the model. The backward stepwise method
was used in the analysis, and the model was terminated
at the ninth step. In this model, approximately 87%
of the dependent variable (PAD group) could be
explained (Nagelkerke R2=0.866). According to this
model, there was a statistically significant relationship between PAD status and sex, age, glucose, creatinine,
fibrinogen, monocytes, platelets, and CRP (p<0.05;
Table 3).
Table 2: Comparisons between groups
Table 3: Analysis with logistic regression
Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is approximately
21.52 times more prevalent in men. It is
1.07 times more common in individuals with higher
age, 1.03 times more common in those with elevated
glucose levels, and 0.34 times more frequent in
those with increased creatinine levels. PAD is also
1.02 times more likely in individuals with higher
fibrinogen levels, 1764.11 times more prevalent in
those with elevated monocyte counts, 1.01 times more common in those with higher platelet counts,
and 1.28 times more frequent in individuals with
elevated CRP levels (Table 3). A prediction table
was created according to the model. Eighty-two
of 87 patients (94.3%) with PAD were predicted
correctly, and 71 of 75 patients (94.7%) without PAD
were predicted correctly. The overall accuracy rate
was found to be 94.4% (Table 4). Variables that were
considered to be more clinically significant and did
not have a high correlation between the variables
that showed differences in pairwise comparisons
between groups (fibrinogen, WBC count, and CRP)
were included in the model. The backward stepwise
method was used in the analysis, and the model was
finalized at the second step. Approximately 67% of the
dependent variable (PAD group) could be explained
in this model (Nagelkerke R2=0.665). According
to this model, there was a statistically significant
relationship between PAD status and fibrinogen and
CRP values (p<0.05; Figures 1-5). Those with high
fibrinogen values were approximately 1.02 times more
likely to have PAD than those without, and those
with high CRP values were approximately 1.18 times
more likely to have PAD than those without (Table
5). A prediction table was created according to the
created model. Eighty of 87 patients (92.0%) with
PAD were predicted correctly, while 69 of 75 patients
(92.0%) without PAD were predicted correctly. The
overall accuracy rate was found to be 92.0% (Table 6).
Table 4: Real and predicted values according to the created model
Table 5: Evaluations with logistic regression
Table 6: Real and predicted values according to the created model
Figure 1: The range of distribution of fibrinogen values in
the control and patient groups.
Figure 2: The range of distribution of CRP values in the
study groups.
Figure 3: Fibrinogen blood levels in the patient and control
groups.
Figure 4: C-reactive protein blood levels in the patient and
control groups.
CRP: C-reactive protein.
Figure 5: White blood cell count blood levels in the patient
and control groups.
WBC: White blood cell count.
As a result of the evaluations conducted
using ROC analysis on the variables found to be
different in pairwise comparisons. The cutoff
points of different variables were as follows:
fasting blood glucose, >110 mg/dL (area under
the curve [AUC]=0.741, 95% confidence interval
[CI]: 0.667-0.807, p<0.001); creatinine, >0.94
(AUC=0.731, 95% CI: 0.656-0.798, p<0.001); eGFR, ≤83 (AUC=0.803, 95% CI: 0.733-0.861,
p<0.001); HDL, ≤43.8 (AUC=0.620, 95% CI:
0.540-0.695, p=0.007); triglycerides, >154.4
(AUC=0.661, 95% CI: 0.583-0.734, p<0.001);
fibrinogen, >373 (AUC=0.923, 95% CI: 0.871-
0.959, p<0.001); monocytes, >0.51 (AUC=0.740,
95% CI: 0.665-0.805, p<0.001); and CRP, >4.76
(AUC=0.781, 95% CI: 0.709-0.842, p<0.001)
(Table 7).
Table 7: Receiver operating characteristic analysis