Coronary bypass surgery is the most common
form of cardiac surgery. Myocardial protection of
the heart during the operation is critical. There is no
consensus on the method and content of cardioplegia
used for this protection.[
6] Reducing cross-clamp and
cardiopulmonary bypass times is another important
issue in cardiac surgery.[
8] Since there is not much
variation in the surgical procedure, efforts are
continuing to reduce this time through cardioplegia
support. Short cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary
bypass time (44.2±14.1 min) observed in our study
is consistent with the literature.[
6] This reduction
seems to be a significant contribution to an important
issue in cardiac surgery. Although this was not the main point of our study, it is clear that single-dose
administration contributes to the reduction of
cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times. It
would not be wrong to think that exposure to the
unwanted side effects of the heart-lung machine will
be decreased accordingly.
There are significant concerns about the use
of DN cardioplegia in coronary artery disease,
particularly in patients with multiple vessels.[9]
Although an effective solution has been provided by
administering retrograde cardioplegia to patients who
are given conventional blood cardioplegia, there may
be confusion in this regard since DN cardioplegia is
applied all at once and antegrade. Another important
benefit of not requiring retrograde cardioplegia is
preventing complications, such as coronary sinus
injury or bleeding from the entrance in the atrium.
As suggested by our study, appropriate cardiac arrest
can be induced with adequate myocardial protection
without the need for retrograde cardioplegia. In
the application of DN cardioplegia to multivessel
patients in our clinic, after the first dose antegrade,
one-fourth of the next dose was given from the
anastomotic grafts (Figure 1). Thus, the distribution
of cardioplegia solution to the whole heart was
facilitated. We believe that this contributed to
myocardial protection. There is convincing evidence
that the DN cardioplegia solution provides strong
myocardial protection.[7,10] In a study by Zeng et al.,[11]
intermittent washing of metabolites and reoxygenation
of blood were demonstrated as an advantage of cold
blood cardioplegia. Regarding our method, we believe that the continuous low dose of cardioplegia
solution from the saphenous veins and, ultimately,
the cleaning of the entire coronary vascular bed with
warm blood from the aorta contributes to the removal
of all metabolites, ensuring better protection of the
myocardium (Figure 2).
Figure 1: Intraoperative view of the cardioplegia solution
being administered from saphenous vein grafts.
Figure 2: Image demonstrates the connecting of the
cardioplegia cannulas to the aortic cannula after the
cross-clamp is lifted.
The DN solution was developed to protect
immature myocardium against reperfusion injury.
However, it has been shown that it also provides
functional improvements in elderly hearts.[12] Inspired
by these studies, we have used the DN cardioplegia
solution in our clinic for the last two years. Although
no significant difference was observed in postoperative
ejection fraction data in our study, the changes in
troponin I values in postoperative follow-up are in
accordance with most of the literature. Despite partial
elevations, troponin I remained at acceptable levels
after coronary artery bypass surgery. It would not
be wrong to characterize the preservation of cardiac
functions in terms of ejection fraction and troponin I
levels. In contrast with this view, some studies have
found that troponin I values were not low in groups
given DN cardioplegia.[13] Although the main goal of
our study was to properly protect cardiac functions
through a new application of DN cardioplegia, the
need for ventricular defibrillation and temporary
pacemakers to address intraoperative arrhythmias
was found to be reduced. The rate of spontaneous
rhythm was noted to be higher. Since there was no
control group in our study, the observational data
were compared with the literature.[14] Considering that there were no differences in the intraoperative
body temperatures, blood gas data, or electrolyte data
of the patients, we believe this finding was an effect
of the cardioplegic solution being strengthened. We
think that delivering the blood from the aorta to
the myocardium through saphenous vein grafts and
completely cleaning the cardioplegia solution also
contributed to this effect. Many studies have reported
a significant decrease in ventricular fibrillation rates
after DN use.[8,15] With less need for defibrillation,
the possibility of subepicardial necrosis, which may
occur through direct contact with the epicardium,
is also reduced-contributing, in turn, to a reduction
in myocardial damage.[16] Moreover, the components
of DN are known to contribute to protection. Due
to its hyperosmotic properties, mannitol is effective
in clearing out free radicals and reducing edema.[17]
Lidocaine acts as a depolarizing agent by inhibiting
sodium channels and reducing calcium and sodium
entry into cells.[18] Another important component in
DN cardioplegia is magnesium. When used as an
electrolyte, magnesium has been proven to increase
myocardial recovery by blocking calcium channels.[19]
One of the challenges in cardiac surgery is the
low cardiac output state. Mechanical support devices
(IABP or ECMO) may be needed in patients who have
difficulty weaning from a cardiopulmonary bypass and
who develop low cardiac output state. The need for
IABP ranges from 7 to 17% in different studies.[20,21]
The fact that this rate was 6% in our study is seen as
a positive outcome. In our study, the need for ECMO
support in only two patients (patients with a 35%
ejection fraction) was also interpreted positively.
When analyzing arrhythmias in our study, positive
effects of the ingredients of the DN (mannitol,
lidocaine, and magnesium) were observed. The
main benefits were the formation of spontaneous
rhythms and reduction in the duration and frequency
of arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation and
ventricular tachycardia. In our study, it was not
possible to analyze all the etiological factors that
may have caused these rhythm disorders one by
one. However, the fact that the frequency of atrial
fibrillation in the literature is 45 to 65% suggests
that cardioplegia solution is effective at a lower
frequency.[20,22] Of course, the findings on this subject
will become stronger as studies are conducted with
larger prospective patient populations. Another
positive finding was that no significant ventricular
arrhythmia was experienced in the early postoperative period by any of the patients treated with DN.
As in many studies, no differences were observed in
the postoperative follow-up parameters (intubation
time, major complications, or discharge time).[23,24] It
was observed that observational intensive care followup
times were shorter compared to our other patients
who underwent conventional cardioplegia. We
believe that the decreased postoperative arrhythmia
contributed to this outcome. Waiting for patients
to recover from arrhythmia before being removed
from the ICU prolongs this period. No significant
difference was observed in terms of the amount of
drainage, the number of blood transfusions, the
number of patients using inotropic support, or the
laboratory data in the postoperative period, which
reflects and supports findings that this cardioplegia
solution can be used safely in isolated coronary artery
bypass grafting.
One of the features of the content of the DN
is a lack of glucose, which decreases the need for
intraoperative insulin administration. Mick et al.[6]
found that glucose levels were lower following the use
of DN, and therefore, less insulin was required. In our
study, we observed that intraoperative glucose control
was easier with low glucose levels.
Although the use of DN cardioplegia for
isolated coronary artery bypass grafting was not
recommended in a study conducted at the Cleveland
Clinic in 2014,[3] more reassuring findings have
been reached in other studies.[15,25] Due to the lack
of studies with prospective large patient numbers,
concerns about this issue cannot be eliminated
completely. However, as shown in many studies,
DN cardioplegia has become increasingly preferred
due to the shortened clamping and operation time
and the possibility of performing cardioplegia all
at once. In a large-scale study, Guajardo Salinas
et al.[15] showed that DN cardioplegia application
provides a significant economic advantage as well
as other clinical benefits. We found that DN could
be used safely in all patients undergoing isolated
coronary bypass by following the method presented
in our study.
The main limitation of this study is that since a
novel application of DN cardioplegia was employed
in the study, it could not be compared with the
classical DN application. The data were compared
instead with the literature. Additionally, only the
ejection fraction and troponin I levels were taken as markers of myocardial protection. This restriction
prevented a strong assessment from being made for
analysis.
In conclusion, although DN cardioplegia solution
is more common in pediatric cardiac surgery,
it is increasingly used in adult cardiac surgery.
However, there are still concerns about its use in
isolated coronary bypass surgery. We believe that
the method we followed together with a single-dose
application will help address these reservations.
Studies with more patients are needed for stronger
interpretations.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was
approved by the Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine
Clinical Research Ethics Committee (date: 04.15.2021,
no: 3/48). The study was conducted in accordance with the
principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Patient Consent for Publication: A written informed
consent was obtained from each patient.
Data Sharing Statement: The data that support the
findings of this study are available from the corresponding
author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions: Idea/concept, design, literature
review, writing the article: F.B.; Data collection and/or
processing: Y.K.; Control/supervision, analysis and/or
interpretation, final approval of the manuscript: B.E.; Analysis
and/or interpretation, final approval of the manuscript: M.Ü.,
K.T.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts
of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication
of this article.
Funding: The authors received no financial support for
the research and/or authorship of this article.